Evidence
Public evidence behind MICHVI's work: sanitised case abstracts, published research and open technical contributions.
Client engagements remain confidential.
Sanitised proof
Governance Case Abstracts
Sanitized governance case abstracts showing structural risks across signal integrity, identity continuity, consent enforcement, attribution, and AI-enabled systems. They are not operational case studies, and they preserve confidentiality.
- Fragmented Identity Continuity
- Reactive Consent Enforcement
- Attribution Structure Misalignment
- AI Signal Dependency Exposure
- Cross-Platform Signal Loss
- Event Taxonomy Drift
- Attribution Model Overconfidence
- Platform Default Data Exposure
- Governance Assumption Without Review
- Unverified Signal Provenance
- Automation Inheriting Ungoverned Assumptions
- Design-Time Governance Deferred to Deployment
Published research
Research
- Signal-Level Observability Gaps in Web-Based Systems: An Observational Study — SSRN Working Paper
- Digital Signal Governance: A Foundational Framework for the Signal Layer of Digital Systems — SSRN Working Paper
- The Changing Governance in India: From Administrative Governance to Digital Governance, and Emerging Governance Questions in the AI Era — SSRN Working Paper
- WP-001: Governance Observability in Digital Systems — Practitioner White Paper
Open source
Public Evidence Structures
Basisline
Preserve evidence, assumptions, decisions, and later outcomes, with a browser interface available for non-technical users.
Control EvidenceEvidence Rail
Record how a child-safety control was applied and how that decision was later reviewed.
Data-Lifecycle EvidenceDeletion Evidence
Document deletion and data-exit actions together with linked verification and exception records.
Public technical contributions maintained separately from confidential MICHVI advisory engagements.
From Evidence to a Decision
When a consequential decision depends on digital evidence, the Evidence Assessment determines how much reliance it can bear.